I cannot decipher as to why humanity is the particular point of interest that constitutes my writing; I am NOT misanthropic in nature (for that defies my constitution); however, certain recent events have converted me so. When I witness others in their daily affairs and interactions, a certain tinge of melancholy pervades my being.
If one is to attain success, then one must maintain a certain element of goodwill towards the collective successes of others, am I not certain? Even if one fails in their academic pursuits, one must sagaciously maintain equanimity even in the most dire situations, not for fear of repercussion nor ostracization, but to satisfy the altruistic aspect of one's personality. However, there will inevitably arise a situation when others haphazardly utilize one's temperance towards individualistic gain. When such a situation arises, one must assert their superiority towards the mediocrity that characterizes the rest of the societal masses, in order to garner a victorious sense of liberation.
As noted in previous essays (that have not been released for publication), since I obtained the ability to formulate a proper sentence, I have been able to verbalize my insistent wants and desires; this incessant verbalization begat actualization; there has always existed a prevailing sense of heliocentricity in the attainment of my desires. The proceedings of daily events have revolved almost exclusively around the realization of these aspirations that would fulfill the innermost sanctum of my being.
In this equanimous state, it has become necessitated to attribute even more significance towards the realization of one's goals; however, one must never serve as an instrument towards the attainment of the goals of others (unless there is some amicable sentiment involved.) One should never assist others in their academic pursuits; I have not adopted a Machiavellian perspective upon current matters; however, there is some evident element involved. One's heliocentricity must center upon the self; and solely be utilized for individualistic gain.
Upon the issue of amicable sentiments, one must be meticulous: the academic should never conflict with the personal nor the social. One must never attach their emotionality towards affairs of rationality; for the two are never in conjunction with one another. In the case of an alliance (as is such my situation), one must devote themselves to the alliance and the alliance only. One should not distress themselves with the affairs of others, for they are of absolutely no consequence. To reiterate, heliocentricity solely possess an individualistic connotation and denotation.
If one is to attain success, then one must maintain a certain element of goodwill towards the collective successes of others, am I not certain? Even if one fails in their academic pursuits, one must sagaciously maintain equanimity even in the most dire situations, not for fear of repercussion nor ostracization, but to satisfy the altruistic aspect of one's personality. However, there will inevitably arise a situation when others haphazardly utilize one's temperance towards individualistic gain. When such a situation arises, one must assert their superiority towards the mediocrity that characterizes the rest of the societal masses, in order to garner a victorious sense of liberation.
As noted in previous essays (that have not been released for publication), since I obtained the ability to formulate a proper sentence, I have been able to verbalize my insistent wants and desires; this incessant verbalization begat actualization; there has always existed a prevailing sense of heliocentricity in the attainment of my desires. The proceedings of daily events have revolved almost exclusively around the realization of these aspirations that would fulfill the innermost sanctum of my being.
In this equanimous state, it has become necessitated to attribute even more significance towards the realization of one's goals; however, one must never serve as an instrument towards the attainment of the goals of others (unless there is some amicable sentiment involved.) One should never assist others in their academic pursuits; I have not adopted a Machiavellian perspective upon current matters; however, there is some evident element involved. One's heliocentricity must center upon the self; and solely be utilized for individualistic gain.
Upon the issue of amicable sentiments, one must be meticulous: the academic should never conflict with the personal nor the social. One must never attach their emotionality towards affairs of rationality; for the two are never in conjunction with one another. In the case of an alliance (as is such my situation), one must devote themselves to the alliance and the alliance only. One should not distress themselves with the affairs of others, for they are of absolutely no consequence. To reiterate, heliocentricity solely possess an individualistic connotation and denotation.
